As yet unnamed concepts that emerge from experience

https://gyazo.com/56510cd5050b141ed5221d776d228949

One may have acquired as yet unnamed abstract concept X by implicit abstraction from [experience

https://gyazo.com/626b10a22e07ff6f1c8e9980a5081ed0

At this point, one can look at the more abstract concept Y and feel that "concept X leads to concept Y"

A sense of "my experience of that or this leads to Y through X, which has not yet been verbalized."

This is a kind of Polanyi's tacit knowledge that "can detect that we are approaching an answer we do not yet know"

https://gyazo.com/d38a64861e3f8686c0911d865d33dc1b

Mr. A is convinced that they connect, but Mr. B doesn't feel the same way because he hasn't had the same experience

B looks at Y and feels that it is a high level of abstraction and unfamiliar

Mr. A cannot communicate X to Mr. B. This is because it has not yet been verbalized.

Mr. A can tell Mr. B about experience E, but it does not connect to Y in Mr. B's mind.

An abstraction from a sufficient amount of experience must be created in Mr. B.

You have to create it yourself.

However, verbal communication of experience tends to lack information.

case

U-theory is perceived as a pattern language of change for those with shared experience, while it appears occult to those with less experience

U Theory and Tokoroten

While Plurality may seem like a seemingly empty buzzword to the inexperienced, ~.

Connection between LLM and Plurality

---

This page is auto-translated from /nishio/経験から浮かび上がるまだ名前のない概念 using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I'm very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.